Join the List

Stay up to date & receive the latest posts in your inbox.

20 Comments

  1. Great post, thank you! I have never liked the $20 decluttering rule for some reason. I never spent much time examining why that might be but this post really clarifies some of my feelings about it.

  2. I’m glad you’ve posted this, because it’s something I have felt very scrnful about. I think part of decluttering is the responsible disposal of whatever you don’t want any more. And throwing away things which are cheap now (even if they weren’t when you bought whatever) is irresponsible. While I’m sure a minimalist wouldn’t intend this, the rule would cover buying a new T-shirt every week and throwing it out before buying the next one.
    I think we have to be much more careful about recycling things we no longer want.

  3. I totally agree with this! When I heard the 20/20 rule I thought the same things. It could be bad for environment because it’s wasteful plus I don’t have time to go shopping all the time so I don’t want throw stuff out because of that. Also, it is mindless not mindful as you mentioned.

    1. Agreed. I can see a danger in it potentially causing people who love to shop to have an excuse to do it more. I do understand that is not the point of the rule, but I just don’t think it’s one that works for everybody.

  4. The older I get the less energy I have to run right out and replace something. And the priced go up. Limited funds makes intentional purchases necessary. also on line purchasing can be a trap- advertising schemes gauge your purchasing mood. and then there’s shipping. also, what about community tools and bartering? that’s an option vs buying for cash.

  5. Don’t drive, done shop ( except Amazon) and we live 25 minutes from the local stores, which usually don’t have what we need most of the time, including groceries! So that 20/20 rule is pure stupidity for me to consider! And discarding items that haven’t been used in a year isn’t wise either. I have a wonderful sunbeam mixer, that only gets used when I am blessed with home care help that actually knows how to read a recepie. (Many don’t). Anyway, declutterring for old, disabled, seniors has to be considered much differently. 20/20 NO good for anyone, bad for the environment.

  6. I like the point this article is making, but I do think the rule is good for the type of person who is anxious about getting rid of every day items. There is peace in knowing you won’t be stuck in a bad situation that you need an item again. In reality, you will probably never need a third ice cream scoop (or whatever the thing is). This rule provides permission to get rid of a lot of “what if’ items because that “what if” scenario will probably never happen.

    1. I do think it can be useful for some people, but for others it could create the opposite problem of over decluttering and then repurchasing. With any decluttering advice it’s going to work well for some, but not likely all and it’s important to know yourself. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Laura πŸ™‚

  7. I am trying to downsize my 13-room house. I hope to have most of my home done by May next year. I am learning it is okay to get rid of something I like. If it can benefit someone else then it is gone. Bye.

  8. With the $20 rule, it doesn’t take into account the fact that quality has degraded across most items. Many times I have found that the identical item from the same company is nowhere near the quality of what I tossed or, in my case, wore out. I have also found that my use cycle is longer than 90 days, so my metrics are different than most.

  9. I believe the Minimalists said they’d had to replace about five items in a few years between the two of them. So maybe if applied judiciously this rule is helpful.

  10. We have also seen in recent years that we cannot assume that the items we part with will be available in the same quality or even available at all. My parents lived through the depression years and learned to repair things or go without them if they were not available at that time. I share this not to live in fear but to use wisdom in not discarding useful items just because we think they will be easily replaced.
    Thanks for great insight in this article and great reminders to be thoughtful in our decluttering/organizing! πŸ™‚

  11. The 90 days also makes no sense. I use Christmas cookie cutters at Christmas, and Halloween ones at Halloween. There’s more than 90 days between Halloweens. Likewise, some winters where I live are frigid. Some have lots of snow. Some years we get little to no snow. I’m not getting rid of my $150 winter boots or coat just because one winter is milder.

  12. I fail to see the logic. I like what you say Julianna: Keep in mind that decluttering isn’t just about getting rid of items. It’s about making conscious choices that enhance your quality of life. When I first got serious about de-cluttering, I admit to acting hastily a few times. I got rid of some things, only to find I needed those items shortly after. It’s better to take the time to honestly consider if it is useful, or just taking up space. Thank you for this article and sharing your thoughts. It’s easy to jump on the bandwagon–but not all ideas are good ones! (I also thought it to have little regard to money–it does not grow on trees!)

  13. I find the 2-minute rule may not be enough time – I’d say 2 to 5 minutes and ONLY if it doesn’t distract you, maybe by setting an alarm. ;H

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *